![]() ![]() How to optimize non-sequential optical systemsĪnd some more information on Optimization can be found in the Help Files at “The Optimize Tab (sequential ui mode) > Optimization Overview”. Using the OpticStudio Non-Sequential Optimization Wizards You may find useful these articles that explains how to perform a Non-Sequential Optimization: The Optimize Tab (sequential ui mode) > Automatic Optimization Group > Merit Function Editor (automatic optimization group) > Optimization Operands by Category > Constraints on Non-sequential Object Data It can be also a good idea to add some constrains (such as maximum/minimum distances) to avoid non-physical solutions. In terms of determining the best focus location for your system, you can also use the Optimization Wizard to build a Merit Function to analyze the RMS Spot Radius. This is sometimes necessary to avoid solutions with no rays landing on the detector. In this example, two monochromatic sources are mixed together to form a white color. If you want to optimize beam to be collimated, as you said, you can use the Optimization Wizard in NSC and choose RMS Angular Radius as criterion to be 0. Additionally, a 'Minimum Flux' target can be specified. A nice example of this is provided in the sample file Example 1 Two-color mixing gives white.ZMX, whichis located in ZemaxSamplesNon-SequentialColorimetry. But would like some expert advice on how to go about it. In particular, the RMS Angular Radius based upon previous forum posts. Make the Thickness of this surface 10 mm, and make the Thickness of surface 7 zero, so that the second CB is co-located with the back of the middle window. I have been playing around with the optimization wizard and the use of the criteria settings. To demonstrate this, click on Surface 8 (the front of window 3), press INSERT again and make the new surface a CB. 1st question is impact of detector settings for optimization (I use rectangular detector). ![]() I have red articles on Zemax page (idea shown in image starting point was optimized as imaging system in sequential mode). I was just hoping to gain some advice and insight into the best method / approach to detemine these z-distances. 1 reply I would like to optimize a 2 lens illumination system for 'high' efficiency and 'high' homogeneity. At the same time, I want to be able to get the most power possible at the detector. A photodiode has not yet been chosen so I currently need to know where to place my components for a collimated path (larger diode) or a focused path (much smaller diode). My objective is to use the merit function to determine the z-distances between each of these components to generate a collimated light path and a focused light path. It includes a UV LED operating at a wavelength of 0.233, an Edmund Optics lens (imported from the 'Lens Catalogue'), and a detector rectangle. I just have some queries about using merit functions to determine the z-distances between the components within my light path, to create both a focused and a collimated light path (see image 2 below).Īt the moment I have a stripped back version of my final light path ( see image 1 below). Whats New - ZEMAX: Software For Optical System Design of 6power.All editors now support a 'Go To' option under the 'View' menu. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |